An Exchange with Raymaker
Following below is an exchange of Emails with Derek Raymaker, a Toronto Liberal. Derek has used his Blog, "Born with a tail" { http://bornwithatail.blogspot.com/ }to suggest that I am somehow stalking audra trower estrones williams, the officially NDPish but in reality totally Liberal moderator of the Rabble.ca/babble bucketshop.
You're pretty tough behind your CUPE flat screen monitor. Like all the other
elflords.----- Original Message -----
From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> ROTFLMAO! Sounds like you and audra have a lot in common!
>
> Budd
>
>
>
> >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> >To: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> >Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:05:55 -0500
> >
> >You're finished. Consider yourself officially disengaged from the Tail.
> >
> >Have a nice day, you stupid cunt.
> >d
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> >To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> >Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 3:28 PM
> >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> >
> >
> > > This is your idea of an intelligent reply is it? Not surprising. You
> > > people are finished.
> > >
> > > Budd.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > >To: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > >Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:17:07 -0500
> > > >
> > > >Jesus, you are one stupid cunt.
> > > >d
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > >To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > >Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:49 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > How's the weather in Toronto, Derek? It's a fine day here in
> >Emerson
> > > > > country. Perhaps before the year is out, Stephen Owen will be the
> > > > > Ambassador to Washington, or a judge, and Emerson will be
> >representing
> > > > > Vancouver Quadra and Ian Waddell, or perhaps even Glen Clark, will
> >be
> > > > > representing Vancouver Kingsway.
> > > > >
> > > > > I wasn't aware Dave Stupich had died. Like many, he's a complex
> >man,
> > > >some
> > > > > good, some bad, and some of it quite bad unfortunately. Premier
> > > >Harcourt
> > > > > launched the forensic accounting investigations that finally
> >unravelled
> > > >the
> > > > > mess and led to charges. The previous SC Govt knew something was
> >fishy,
> > > >but
> > > > > did nothing, ... one of their Minister's, Jim Chabot, who knew
> > > >something,
> > > > > would sometimes taunt Stupich with interjections that consisted of
> >just
> > > >the
> > > > > word "Bingo". But Chabot, who was the Minister in charge of
> >lotteries
> > > >and
> > > > > gaming, never wanted to look into things too deeply because SC
used
> > > >vairous
> > > > > bingos themselves as fundraising gimmicks.
> > > > >
> > > > > As a result of the investigations into NCHS, the BC election
statute
> >is
> > > >now
> > > > > very restrictive on the use of any kind of game of chance. Even
> >little
> > > > > 50:50 draws have to be so extensively documented that they are
> >usually
> > > > > avoided.
> > > > >
> > > > > In any case, if I were you, I would not be worrying about what
will
> > > >happen
> > > > > to legitimate public servants organized by CUPE or PSAC or PIPS or
> >CAPE
> > > >or
> > > > > the OPSEU or the BCGEU or any other union. I would be worrying
> >about
> > > >what
> > > > > Liberals like yourself are going to do now that your party is over
> >$30
> > > > > million in debt, has far fewer individual donors than either the
> >Tories
> > > >or
> > > > > the NDP despite the never-ending patronage lists of lawyers,
> > > >consultants,
> > > > > etc., and is no longer in power and therefore no longer has access
> >to
> > > > > bottomless pits of Sponsorship loot. And Jean Chretien changed
the
> >Act
> > > >so
> > > > > that no party can access business any longer. In the game of
chess
> >they
> > > > > call this kind situation "checkmate".
> > > > >
> > > > > You pricks are really sucking on a dry hole, and it's going to get
a
> > > >whole
> > > > > lot drier. There is no new generation of idealistic youth who are
> >going
> > > >to
> > > > > rush to join the Liberals now that you're in Opposition. Why, ...
> >you
> > > >boys
> > > > > have lost your famous charm all of a sudden, ... shocking, isn't
it?
> > > >And
> > > > > even if they were, the kids don't have anywhere near the kind of
> > > >mega-cash
> > > > > you need, so the Young Liberals won't be able to throw kool
> > > >drugs/booze/sex
> > > > > parties because there won't be the endless bags of free money.
You
> > > >reckless
> > > > > bastards have painted yourselves into the tightest god-damn corner
> >I've
> > > >ever
> > > > > seen, and it's going to be neat watching over the next few months
as
> >the
> > > > > genetically predisposed arrogance smacks face-first into the
> > > >overwhelming
> > > > > odds, and starts to give way in favour of raw panic, sheer terror
at
> >the
> > > > > realization that you and your party are totally screwed for at
least
> >a
> > > > > generation, and quite possibly forever.
> > > > >
> > > > > Have a nice day in Toronto, Derek. Is there any way you can find
a
> >gig
> > > > > there for an enterprising young star named Bill Cunningham? I
don't
> > > >know
> > > >if
> > > > > he has any experience with garage bands, but maybe he could do the
> > > >blogging
> > > > > while you do the drug deals?
> > > > >
> > > > > Budd
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > >To: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > > > >Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:28:15 -0500
> > > > > >
> > > > > >So will you be going to Dave Stupich's funeral to pay your
> >'respects'?
> > > >I
> > > > > >mean, it's not like you've got any real work to do at CUPE.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > >To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > >Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:42 AM
> > > > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You don't even have the slightest idea what you're talking
> >about,
> >do
> > > >you
> > > > > > > Raymaker? You really are a pathetic, dishonest Liberal hack.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Moe Sihota was hated by Liberals because of his talent, and
the
> >fact
> > > >he
> > > > > > > represented an ethnic community that filthy Liberal organizers
> > > >wanted
> > > >to
> > > > > > > take control of. So they used their influence in the Law
> >Sociiety
> > > >to
> > > > > >nail
> > > > > > > him with some phoney raps. Adrian Dix is bilingual, was for
> >several
> > > > > >years
> > > > > > > head of BC Parents for French, and since the 2005 election has
> >been
> > > > > >making
> > > > > > > headlines and having a very positive impact as the opposiiton
> >critic
> > > >for
> > > > > > > family and children's issues, and some of the coverage has
> >extended
> > > > > > > nationally.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You're a typical rock bottom Toronto Liberal ratfucker,
> >Raymaker.
> > > >What
> > > > > >the
> > > > > > > hell pigs like you are going to do now that the partonage is
cut
> >off
> > > >I
> > > > > >have
> > > > > > > no idea. I guess you just figure that if you're big enough
> >liars,
> > > >some
> > > > > > > other abusive and dishonest organization will pick you up and
> >make
> > > > > > > profitable use of you. Who knows, ... you might end up
working
> >for
> > > >the
> > > > > >CIA
> > > > > > > or some simliar outfit!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Budd
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > > > >To: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > > > > > >Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:07:14 -0500
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I should know you're a BC government employee when you write
> > > > > >long-winded
> > > > > > > >lies in the middle of the afternoon when you should be
working.
> > > >That
> > > > > >and
> > > > > > > >the
> > > > > > > >fact your spelling is crap.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I've got two words for you, Bud:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Moe Sihota.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Oh, I've got two more for you:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Adrian Dix.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Have a nice weekend, asshole.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >derek
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > >From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > >To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > > > >Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:56 PM
> > > > > > > >Subject: RE: "Consulting"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > People like you are completely dishonest, rally repugnant
> >stuff.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I never took a patronage appointment in my life, and your
> >stupid
> > > >and
> > > > > > > > > dishonest crack about Glen Clark is more proof of your
> >pathetic
> > > > > >Liberal
> > > > > > > > > dishonesty. One reason Glen Clark lost is that he refused
> >to
> > > >hand
> > > > > >out
> > > > > > > >the
> > > > > > > > > spoils some demanded. Your Liberal campaign consultants
> >like
> > > >Mike
> > > > > > > >Geoghegan
> > > > > > > > > are proof of that. He had been with the NDP and when his
> > > >Minister
> > > > > >lost
> > > > > > > >and
> > > > > > > > > Clark wouldn't give him a cushy appointment, he went over
to
> >the
> > > > > > > >Liberals
> > > > > > > > > and became one of Clark's most bitter opponents.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As a govenment employee I have been seriously concerned
> >about
> > > >the
> > > > > > > >Liberal
> > > > > > > > > Govt's erosion of the merit principle and ever increasing
> >doses
> > > >of
> > > > > > > > > administrative patronage by the career bureaucrats being
> > > >tolerated.
> > > > > >You
> > > > > > > > > link that up to the Sponshorship scandal, where hundreds
of
> > > >career
> > > > > >civil
> > > > > > > > > servants in Ottawa REFUSED to blow the whistle, because
they
> > > >wanted
> > > > > >to
> > > > > > > >be
> > > > > > > > > nice to the Liberals, and you can see a real cancer
starting
> >to
> > > > > >grow.
> > > > > > > >If
> > > > > > > > > that trend had been allowed to continue you would have, in
> >ten
> > > >or
> > > > > > > >fifteen
> > > > > > > > > years time, have been living in a country where your
> >passport
> > > >and
> > > > > > > >drivers
> > > > > > > > > licence renewal would cost you $100 on the table and $500
> >under
> > > >the
> > > > > > > >table.
> > > > > > > > > All thanks to patronage pigs like you, plus an apathetic
> > > >electorate,
> > > > > > > > > especially in Toronto but here in Vancouver too, that will
> > > >excuse
> > > > > >the
> > > > > > > > > Liberals anything.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Budd.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > > > > > >To: <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > >Subject: "Consulting"
> > > > > > > > > >Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:52:21 -0500
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >Sounds like you know your way around the trough better
than
> >I
> > > >do,
> > > > > > > >asshole.
> > > > > > > > > >Glen Clark must have been very good to you.
> > > > > > > > > >derek
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >_________________________________________________________________
You're pretty tough behind your CUPE flat screen monitor. Like all the other
elflords.----- Original Message -----
From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> ROTFLMAO! Sounds like you and audra have a lot in common!
>
> Budd
>
>
>
> >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> >To: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> >Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:05:55 -0500
> >
> >You're finished. Consider yourself officially disengaged from the Tail.
> >
> >Have a nice day, you stupid cunt.
> >d
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> >To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> >Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 3:28 PM
> >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> >
> >
> > > This is your idea of an intelligent reply is it? Not surprising. You
> > > people are finished.
> > >
> > > Budd.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > >To: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > >Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:17:07 -0500
> > > >
> > > >Jesus, you are one stupid cunt.
> > > >d
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > >To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > >Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:49 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > How's the weather in Toronto, Derek? It's a fine day here in
> >Emerson
> > > > > country. Perhaps before the year is out, Stephen Owen will be the
> > > > > Ambassador to Washington, or a judge, and Emerson will be
> >representing
> > > > > Vancouver Quadra and Ian Waddell, or perhaps even Glen Clark, will
> >be
> > > > > representing Vancouver Kingsway.
> > > > >
> > > > > I wasn't aware Dave Stupich had died. Like many, he's a complex
> >man,
> > > >some
> > > > > good, some bad, and some of it quite bad unfortunately. Premier
> > > >Harcourt
> > > > > launched the forensic accounting investigations that finally
> >unravelled
> > > >the
> > > > > mess and led to charges. The previous SC Govt knew something was
> >fishy,
> > > >but
> > > > > did nothing, ... one of their Minister's, Jim Chabot, who knew
> > > >something,
> > > > > would sometimes taunt Stupich with interjections that consisted of
> >just
> > > >the
> > > > > word "Bingo". But Chabot, who was the Minister in charge of
> >lotteries
> > > >and
> > > > > gaming, never wanted to look into things too deeply because SC
used
> > > >vairous
> > > > > bingos themselves as fundraising gimmicks.
> > > > >
> > > > > As a result of the investigations into NCHS, the BC election
statute
> >is
> > > >now
> > > > > very restrictive on the use of any kind of game of chance. Even
> >little
> > > > > 50:50 draws have to be so extensively documented that they are
> >usually
> > > > > avoided.
> > > > >
> > > > > In any case, if I were you, I would not be worrying about what
will
> > > >happen
> > > > > to legitimate public servants organized by CUPE or PSAC or PIPS or
> >CAPE
> > > >or
> > > > > the OPSEU or the BCGEU or any other union. I would be worrying
> >about
> > > >what
> > > > > Liberals like yourself are going to do now that your party is over
> >$30
> > > > > million in debt, has far fewer individual donors than either the
> >Tories
> > > >or
> > > > > the NDP despite the never-ending patronage lists of lawyers,
> > > >consultants,
> > > > > etc., and is no longer in power and therefore no longer has access
> >to
> > > > > bottomless pits of Sponsorship loot. And Jean Chretien changed
the
> >Act
> > > >so
> > > > > that no party can access business any longer. In the game of
chess
> >they
> > > > > call this kind situation "checkmate".
> > > > >
> > > > > You pricks are really sucking on a dry hole, and it's going to get
a
> > > >whole
> > > > > lot drier. There is no new generation of idealistic youth who are
> >going
> > > >to
> > > > > rush to join the Liberals now that you're in Opposition. Why, ...
> >you
> > > >boys
> > > > > have lost your famous charm all of a sudden, ... shocking, isn't
it?
> > > >And
> > > > > even if they were, the kids don't have anywhere near the kind of
> > > >mega-cash
> > > > > you need, so the Young Liberals won't be able to throw kool
> > > >drugs/booze/sex
> > > > > parties because there won't be the endless bags of free money.
You
> > > >reckless
> > > > > bastards have painted yourselves into the tightest god-damn corner
> >I've
> > > >ever
> > > > > seen, and it's going to be neat watching over the next few months
as
> >the
> > > > > genetically predisposed arrogance smacks face-first into the
> > > >overwhelming
> > > > > odds, and starts to give way in favour of raw panic, sheer terror
at
> >the
> > > > > realization that you and your party are totally screwed for at
least
> >a
> > > > > generation, and quite possibly forever.
> > > > >
> > > > > Have a nice day in Toronto, Derek. Is there any way you can find
a
> >gig
> > > > > there for an enterprising young star named Bill Cunningham? I
don't
> > > >know
> > > >if
> > > > > he has any experience with garage bands, but maybe he could do the
> > > >blogging
> > > > > while you do the drug deals?
> > > > >
> > > > > Budd
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > >To: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > > > >Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:28:15 -0500
> > > > > >
> > > > > >So will you be going to Dave Stupich's funeral to pay your
> >'respects'?
> > > >I
> > > > > >mean, it's not like you've got any real work to do at CUPE.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > >To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > >Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:42 AM
> > > > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You don't even have the slightest idea what you're talking
> >about,
> >do
> > > >you
> > > > > > > Raymaker? You really are a pathetic, dishonest Liberal hack.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Moe Sihota was hated by Liberals because of his talent, and
the
> >fact
> > > >he
> > > > > > > represented an ethnic community that filthy Liberal organizers
> > > >wanted
> > > >to
> > > > > > > take control of. So they used their influence in the Law
> >Sociiety
> > > >to
> > > > > >nail
> > > > > > > him with some phoney raps. Adrian Dix is bilingual, was for
> >several
> > > > > >years
> > > > > > > head of BC Parents for French, and since the 2005 election has
> >been
> > > > > >making
> > > > > > > headlines and having a very positive impact as the opposiiton
> >critic
> > > >for
> > > > > > > family and children's issues, and some of the coverage has
> >extended
> > > > > > > nationally.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You're a typical rock bottom Toronto Liberal ratfucker,
> >Raymaker.
> > > >What
> > > > > >the
> > > > > > > hell pigs like you are going to do now that the partonage is
cut
> >off
> > > >I
> > > > > >have
> > > > > > > no idea. I guess you just figure that if you're big enough
> >liars,
> > > >some
> > > > > > > other abusive and dishonest organization will pick you up and
> >make
> > > > > > > profitable use of you. Who knows, ... you might end up
working
> >for
> > > >the
> > > > > >CIA
> > > > > > > or some simliar outfit!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Budd
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > > > >To: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > >Subject: Re: "Consulting"
> > > > > > > >Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:07:14 -0500
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I should know you're a BC government employee when you write
> > > > > >long-winded
> > > > > > > >lies in the middle of the afternoon when you should be
working.
> > > >That
> > > > > >and
> > > > > > > >the
> > > > > > > >fact your spelling is crap.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I've got two words for you, Bud:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Moe Sihota.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Oh, I've got two more for you:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Adrian Dix.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Have a nice weekend, asshole.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >derek
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > >From: "Bud Campbell" <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > >To: <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > > > >Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:56 PM
> > > > > > > >Subject: RE: "Consulting"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > People like you are completely dishonest, rally repugnant
> >stuff.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I never took a patronage appointment in my life, and your
> >stupid
> > > >and
> > > > > > > > > dishonest crack about Glen Clark is more proof of your
> >pathetic
> > > > > >Liberal
> > > > > > > > > dishonesty. One reason Glen Clark lost is that he refused
> >to
> > > >hand
> > > > > >out
> > > > > > > >the
> > > > > > > > > spoils some demanded. Your Liberal campaign consultants
> >like
> > > >Mike
> > > > > > > >Geoghegan
> > > > > > > > > are proof of that. He had been with the NDP and when his
> > > >Minister
> > > > > >lost
> > > > > > > >and
> > > > > > > > > Clark wouldn't give him a cushy appointment, he went over
to
> >the
> > > > > > > >Liberals
> > > > > > > > > and became one of Clark's most bitter opponents.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As a govenment employee I have been seriously concerned
> >about
> > > >the
> > > > > > > >Liberal
> > > > > > > > > Govt's erosion of the merit principle and ever increasing
> >doses
> > > >of
> > > > > > > > > administrative patronage by the career bureaucrats being
> > > >tolerated.
> > > > > >You
> > > > > > > > > link that up to the Sponshorship scandal, where hundreds
of
> > > >career
> > > > > >civil
> > > > > > > > > servants in Ottawa REFUSED to blow the whistle, because
they
> > > >wanted
> > > > > >to
> > > > > > > >be
> > > > > > > > > nice to the Liberals, and you can see a real cancer
starting
> >to
> > > > > >grow.
> > > > > > > >If
> > > > > > > > > that trend had been allowed to continue you would have, in
> >ten
> > > >or
> > > > > > > >fifteen
> > > > > > > > > years time, have been living in a country where your
> >passport
> > > >and
> > > > > > > >drivers
> > > > > > > > > licence renewal would cost you $100 on the table and $500
> >under
> > > >the
> > > > > > > >table.
> > > > > > > > > All thanks to patronage pigs like you, plus an apathetic
> > > >electorate,
> > > > > > > > > especially in Toronto but here in Vancouver too, that will
> > > >excuse
> > > > > >the
> > > > > > > > > Liberals anything.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Budd.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >From: "Derek Raymaker" <derekraymaker@rogers.com>
> > > > > > > > > >To: <budcampbell@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > >Subject: "Consulting"
> > > > > > > > > >Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:52:21 -0500
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >Sounds like you know your way around the trough better
than
> >I
> > > >do,
> > > > > > > >asshole.
> > > > > > > > > >Glen Clark must have been very good to you.
> > > > > > > > > >derek
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >_________________________________________________________________
posted by Budd Campbell at 10:54 AM
5 Comments:
This comment has been removed by the author.
Raymaker, the truth is quite the opposite, as you well know. You're the one needing help, help with personal issues and help with the fact that your support network is broke and out of power.
Russell, I tried to find your blog, but it doesn't exist. So why should I answser your questions?
Russell, I don't see why I should answer questions from someone who posts nothing themselves and doesn't even have an EMail address.
I created a blog because of my disgust for the way audra trower estrones williams runs the Judy Rebick/Buzz Hargrove sponsored Rabble/Babble bucketshop. It's a joke and a Liberal front, not to mention a kind of net lounge for Communists and extreme feminists to bait and denounce the moderate, democratic left. If that suits your purposes as a Liberal, fine, praise audra all you want.
I liked your passage that read:
"Reminds me of a kid I knew back in elementry school who used to respond to insults by saying "I redirect that insult back to you""
... because it reminds me of a guy I knew in college who got lousy marks in every subject.
And this one's a keeper:
"I don't know Audry personnally, I don't even know her over the internet. but she is doing her job, moderating forums. what she says goes."
You don't know anything about her, but you do know she's doing a good, honest job. Like Hell!
As to your final question, "And, may I ask where you're planning on going with this blog?", sure. I plan to keep on criticizing audra and Michelle's until Rabble cleans up it act.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Post a Comment
<< Home